Negotiating Gender Rights and Gender Relations in the Constitutionmaking Process in Egypt: Towards a ‘Thick’ Constitutional Guarantee for Women’s Rights
PDF

Keywords

Constitution
Egypt
Gender

How to Cite

Kuwahara, N. (1). Negotiating Gender Rights and Gender Relations in the Constitutionmaking Process in Egypt: Towards a ‘Thick’ Constitutional Guarantee for Women’s Rights. Al-Raida Journal, 43-54. https://doi.org/10.32380/alrj.v0i0.1725

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to explore gender-sensitive constitution-making. I will examine the constitution-making process in Egypt, as well as the constitutions themselves, from comparative constitutional law and gender perspectives, and I will then include the Japanese experience. Constitutionalizing or legalizing women’s issues is one of the most controversial or challenging legal areas because women’s issues are often assumed to be matters deeply embedded in tradition or culture, and therefore, it has been held that changing the status-quo relating to women’s issues will erode the tradition or culture which should be protected.

https://doi.org/10.32380/alrj.v0i0.1725
PDF

References

Ackerman, B. (1997). The rise of world constitutionalism. Virginia Law Review, 83, 771-797.

Baines, B. & Rubio-Marin, R. (2005). Introduction: Toward a feminist constitutional agenda. In Baines, B. & Rubio-Marin, R. (Eds.), The gender of constitutional jurisprudence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, Kindle edition.

Blount, J. (2011). Participation in constitutional design. In Ginsburg, T. & Dixon, R. (Eds.), Comparative constitutional law (pp. 38-56). Cheltenham & Northampton: Edward Elgar.

Dobrowolsky, A. & Hart, V. (Eds.). (2003). Women making constitutions: New politics and comparative perspectives. Hampshire & New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Ginsburg, T. & Dixon, R. (2011). Introduction. In Ginsburg, T. & Dixon, R. (Eds.), Comparative constitutional law (pp. 1-15). Cheltenham & Northampton: Edward Elgar.

Hirshl, R. (2007). Towards juristocracy: The origins and consequences of the new constitutionalism. Cambridge & London: Harvard University Press.

Irving, H. (2011). Drafting, design and gender. In Ginsburg, T. & Dixon, R. (Eds.), Comparative constitutional law (pp. 18-37). Cheltenham & Northampton: Edward Elgar.

Irving, H. (2008). Gender and the constitution: Equity and agency in comparative constitutional design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, Kindle edition.

Moussa, J. (2011). Competing fundamentalisms and Egyptian women’s family rights: International law and the reform of Shari’a-derived legislation. Leiden & Boston: Brill.

Sullivan, K.M. (2002). Constitutionalizing women’s equality. California Law Review, 90(3), 735-764.

Williams, S.H. (2009). Introduction: Comparative constitution law, gender equality, and constitutional design. In Williams, S.H. (Ed.) Constituting equality: Gender equality and comparative constitutional law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, Kindle edition.

Egypt. 1971. The Constitution of the Arab Republic of Egypt 1971.

Egypt. 2012. The Constitution of the Arab Republic of Egypt 2012.

Egypt. 2014. The Constitution of the Arab Republic of Egypt 2014

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.